Portfolios as a Substitute for Proficiency Examinations (Elbow, Belanoff)

29 Oct

Portfolio evaluation, the authors argue in this short essay, is superior to single sample-based proficiency examinations, because portfolios honor pedagogy and allow the process model to work. Elbow and Belanoff argue that a good measure of student success in a writing course(s) is one that allows multiple, self-selected samples, along with formative feedback by the teacher. Additionally, they propose a model where portfolios are locally evaluated, using the student’s teacher along with another teacher who does not know the student, with the two educators deciding whether the portfolio achieves the “C” (pass) rating or not. If a portfolio fails because of one paper, the student is given the chance to revise it; if it fails as a whole, the student has to retake the writing course.

I do see a strength in this method, along with the ones the authors identify: it gives the student work an outside audience. Often, as Elbow and Belanoff note, teachers become kind of implicated in student writing, especially if a process model is followed. We’ve helped shape these papers, so we are, to some degree, implicated in the result. However, if another rater is introduced, it gives us a way to look at the product as well as the process.

Leave a comment

Posted by on October 29, 2013 in Uncategorized


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: