William Condon Large-scale assessment, locally-developed measures, and automated scoring of essays: Fishing for red herrings?

12 Nov

Rank: 1 – I gave this article this low rank because I think Condon is not only opposed to AES, he is also opposed to short, single sample timed essay writing tests as well – the kinds of assessments that make AES possible.

Argument: the kinds of tests that AES can score do not accurately represent the construct of writing, they have a low (.49) correlation rate with course grades/portfolio scores, and their ability to predict student success is also low (103).

Assumptions: The assumption is that all writing assessments, for whatever purpose, should reflect accurate constructs of writing. There is also the assumption that rich, descriptive, locally based assessments are better in all situations as well.

Points of Interest: I found it interesting that Condon would cite low-levels of predictability and correlation with course grades, since one of the major claims of AES is that it can accurately and reliably place students (103).

Leave a comment

Posted by on November 12, 2013 in Uncategorized


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: